Location Calicut
Large Dairy. The
auditor raised a query that the FSMS risk rating system should be
mathematically modeled and the decision whether the food safety risk was
significant or not should be taken based on a risk priority number (RPN).
However the same hazard assessment had
been cleared by their own audit team member for another location (unit of the
same parent company) in the group.
I checked the model he had suggested as
a template. Even for the “yes or no” questions in the hazard assessment, you
have to assign marks 1,5,10 depending on the assessment, multiply all numbers
together and then arrive at an “RPN”.
It was “pure mathematical magic” What is the
purpose? The Lead Tutor from the same organisation, who taught us, had asked us
to keep the rating model simple. The auditor can suggest anything and go away.
The Food Safety team will then have to pointlessly waste their time (in
calculations-like probability of earthquake or rains- for which super computers
have to be used for).
I
believe the management systems are for “better practices” to be in built and
control risks, not to make brilliant
mathematics to impress and confuse.
Whither auditor consistency